News & Blog


When I answered the phone it was a woman from the Department of Justice.  Sure!  I thought this was a prank call.  But then she went on to explain that the reason for the call was to set up a conference call with their lawyers to discuss the upcoming Tribune and Sinclair Broadcasting merger and the impact on my retail client in the Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem market.   How interesting!  In my 35+ years of media buying handling some larger, Fortune 500 accounts, I've never been asked by the government about my opinion. . . .nor do I know anyone else in the industry that has.  What did they want to know?

To my surprise, I spent an hour on the phone answering questions about how I make my buy decisions and how would the merger impact my client and the market, speaking to a group that was highly intelligent about the process.  They genuinely wanted to understand how share of dollars to each station are determined,  what elements go into the negotiation,  what would change with the merger, and how would this affect the cost of advertising in the market.

Yes, they knew what a DMA is!  There are 6 major broadcast stations in the Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem DMA, with currently 4 ownerships.  WXII (NBC),  is owned by Hearst and operating  sister station WCWG (CW); WFMY (CBS) is owned by Tegna Media;  WGHP (Fox) is owned by Tribune;  and WXLV (ABC) and WMYV (MY TV) are owned by Sinclair.  With the merger, this would go down to only 3 ownerships.


As a media buyer, am I concerned  about this merger?  What would be the impact on costs and programming?  To answer the question, yes I am concerned about the merger and am very impressed that our government is doing due diligence to understand how the local market will be affected.  Television advertising is still an extremely effective method of advertising for local retailers.

The lawyers asked if cable or digital media would be good alternatives to broadcast television.  My opinion is that they all are very good forms of media, but one does not replace the other.   While cable is viewed on a television set, how they price and sell their advertising is quite different from broadcast.  Not to say one is better than  the other, just different.

Cable buying is more like digital on-line buys; it's programmatic based on algorithmic purchasing.  Customized software is used to automate the buying, placement and optimization of media inventory. Audience profiling and statistical data are computed to determine the effectiveness of a media schedule.  Frequency of exposures to your advertising message are built by increasing budget and take time to accumulate.   

Local cable systems only get a few minutes per hour for local advertising, whereas broadcast stations have more available inventory per hour. The way cable manages its inventory, it's hard to force a frequency level. Cable oversells their inventory then pre-empts without notice.  So even if you buy heavily in a time period, most likely it will not run.  Frequency can be more easily purchased  on broadcast since they have more inventory and price based on availability. Frequency of exposure to ads on broadcast can be achieved by buying spots every 15 to 30 minutes within specific programming or time periods.    On digital, frequency is better handled via retargeting or remarketing campaigns.

In other words, cable and digital media need to be considered as part of a media mix, not as an alternative to buying broadcast television.  No differently than deciding to do radio, newspaper, magazines or billboards.  It's part of an overall media strategy.


So back to the original question, how will the ownership change impact buying broadcast advertising.
In this particular case, I don't think it will have a negative impact.  I buy many markets in which Sinclair dominates the market, either in ratings or with number of stations.  In my experience, Sinclair runs good stations.  They invest in popular programming and are fair and reasonable in their pricing.

With strong competition from  WFMY-TV and WXII-TV, and up and coming CW, there is enough competition within the market to control pricing.  In fact, the Greensboro market actually is lower in price than its ranking.  So, if there is a slight increase in rates, it won't have a tremendously  negative impact.  Regardless of how many stations have the same ownership, they still can only justify rates based on the audience they deliver.  If they out-price themselves, the advertisers will not get results and the industry will kill the golden goose.

It will be interesting to hear how the Department of Justice proceeds with this potential merger.


Want to know more about local media buying and how your dollars can be maximized? Call Barbara at Media Power Advertising at 704-567-1000 or send email to [email protected]

Please select one or more of the options below or type a phrase in the search box.

All in one search

Date range


Find Out How Powerful Media Can Work For You

Ready for more information on how MPA can help solve your marketing and media challenges? Fill out our form to arrange a free consultation.
Please Enter Your Name

Please enter your company name

Please enter a valid email address

Please enter a valid phone number

Invalid Input

Read Our Advertising Case Studies

Want the details on how we've successfully helped dozens of businesses optimize their marketing strategies and reach countless consumers? See what our clients have to say and learn how our media strategy can help your business excel.

  • Have you ever wondered if you are really getting all the media exposure you pay for? Do you know where the hidden costs are if your staff or your ad agency is not skilled at forecasting rating points? Do you know how often the stations on your buy run the wrong traffic or fail to deliver the planned GRPs?

    Do your customers allow YOU to charge for products and services that weren't delivered as ordered? Do you know many ad agencies and advertisers do exactly that? You shouldn't pay for media that doesn't run as projected, negotiated and ordered; but you probably do if you aren't conducting media performance audits.

    One client hired MPA to conduct a sample audit of their in-house media department. They selected three markets- Dallas, Charlotte and Pittsburgh. We audited their entire process – from plans to buys, from invoices to payment vouchers.They advertised weekly entertainment events so it was important that spots run as ordered. Most radio stations demanded payment in advance because entertainment clients are considered "transient" advertisers.To our client's surprise (but not ours) the media performance audit revealed that not one single radio station ran their schedules as ordered. Traffic was wrong, critical days were missed, the number of spots varied, but the client was paying 100% for the advertising as ordered.

    I thought we were running a pretty tight operation until MPA conducted a performance audit. The annual impact of this slippage easily cost our company over $250,000 per year. We believe in the MPA way of guarding our money.

Read Other Stories